This study comprehensively examines the pedagogical and methodological potential of using digital technologies, particularly virtual laboratories, in chemistry education. In the context of modern educational environments, it has been identified that material and technical limitations, increased safety requirements, and organizational and logistical challenges significantly hinder the effective development of students’ practical skills during laboratory activities. Therefore, identifying the didactic potential of virtual laboratories as an alternative to traditional experimental practices represents a key research focus.

Within the research methodology, a systematic review of both domestic and international scientific literature was conducted, along with a comparative analysis of the content and structure of digital educational resources. Specifically, the functional capabilities of virtual laboratories, the mechanisms of laboratory automation, and the effectiveness of integrating artificial intelligence were examined. In addition, a comparative evaluation of international educational platforms such as PhET, TeachChemistry, Merlot, and ChemCollective was carried out in terms of their content features and practical applicability.

The findings demonstrate that virtual laboratories enhance students’ cognitive engagement and facilitate the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical experience. Digital simulations and modeling provide clear visualization of complex chemical processes and enable safe experimentation. This, in turn, contributes to the development of research skills, critical thinking, and problem-solving competencies. Moreover, the automation of laboratory procedures and the use of digital data-processing tools improve research productivity, as well as the accuracy and reproducibility of results.

Overall, the study confirms that the systematic implementation of virtual laboratories and dig.ital technologies in chemistry education is an effective approach to improving the quality of education, increasing student motivation, and developing professional competencies aligned with contemporary educational standards.

KOPTILEU S.B.

Master's student, K. Zhubanov Aktobe regional university, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

E-mail: sara.koptileu@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3507-3576

SEMENIKHINA S.F.

Candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, K.Zhubanov Aktobe regional university, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

E-mail: Svetasemen69@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0958-8256

1. Bazie, H., Lemma, B., Workneh, A., & Estifanos, A. (2024). The Effect of Virtual Laboratories on the Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Chemistry Students: Quasi-Experimental Study // JMIR Formative Research, 8, 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.64476
2. S. Hessam M. Mehr. Digital discovery and the new experimental frontier // Royal Society of Chemistry Digital Discovery. – 2025. – Vol. 4, №4. – P. 892–895.
3. Morrin, A., et al. (2026). A study on student perceptions and engagement with a virtual instrumentation twin in an undergraduate analytical chemistry laboratory// Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10320-w
4. Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A.Virtual chemistry laboratory: Effect of constructivist learning environment // Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. – 2013. 183-199.
5. Makransky G., Thisgaard M., Gadegaard H. Virtual simulations as preparation for lab exercises: Assessing learning of key laboratory skills in microbiology and improvement of essential non-cognitive skills // PLOS ONE. – 2016. – Vol. 11, № 6.,11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155895
6. Zaurova, S. B., Sagimbaeva, A. E. & Mukataeva, J. S. (2023). The Importance of Using a Virtual Laboratory in the Education System // Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Pädagogik und Wirtschaft, 405(5), 114–131.
7. Mehr, S. H. M. (2025). Digital discovery and the new experimental frontier // Digital Discovery, 4(4), 892–895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00029G
8. Roch, L. M., et al. ChemOS: An orchestration software to democratize autonomous discovery // PLoS ONE. – 2018.,18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.5953606.v1
9. Wieman, C., Adams, W., & Perkins, K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning // Science, 322(5902), 682–683.
10. Perkins, K., et al. (2006). PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics // The Physics Teacher, 44, 18–23.

virtual laboratory, artificial intelligence, PhET, TeachChemistry.org, Merlot, ChemCollective, practical work, interactive learning