ISSUES OF DESIGNING AN AI-BASED WEB PLATFORMFOR AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT WORK ASSIGNMENTS

Published 2026-06-30
PHYSICS-MATHEMATICS Vol. 84 No. 2 (2026)
Том 84 №2 2026
Authors:
  • Eleubergen ZH. A.
  • BAIBAKTINA A.T
PDF (Kazakh)

This paper explores the theoretical and practical aspects of designing an artificial intelligence-based web platform for automated assessment of students’ independent work assignments in higher education institutions. The main objective of the study is to develop a conceptual model of an assessment system that integrates natural language processing (NLP), machine learning algorithms, and cloud infrastructure to ensure objectivity, scalability, and adaptability of the grading process. The paper analyzes the evolution of automated assessment systems, their role in education, and current technological approaches. Particular attention is given to the architecture of the proposed platform, including frontend, backend, and AI modules, as well as dataset requirements and the functioning principles of evaluation algorithms. The study considers semantic analysis methods based on BERT/GPT models, text similarity detection, plagiarism checking techniques, and real-time analytics tools. A comparative analysis with widely used platforms such as Google Classroom, Coursera, and Moodle is conducted, highlighting the advantages of the proposed system. A key feature of the platform is its adaptation to the Kazakhstani educational context, including support for the Kazakh language. The findings demonstrate that the implementation of such a system can significantly reduce instructors’ workload, improve assessment accuracy, and provide timely feedback to students. The proposed solution represents an important step toward the digitalization and modernization of higher education systems.

Eleubergen ZH. A.

Master's student, K. Zhubanov Aktobe regional university, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.

E-mail: janbolat.work.2025@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9737-5440

BAIBAKTINA A.T

Candidate of pedagogical sciences, docent, K. Zhubanov Aktobe regional university, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

E-mail: aksaule67@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-1252

  1. Shermis M. D., Burstein J. (Eds.) Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. 238 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606860
  2. Ramesh D., Sanampudi S. K. An automated essay scoring systems: a systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2022. Vol. 55, Issue 3. P. 2495–2527. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10068-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10068-2
  3. Alam A. Should Robots Replace Teachers? Mobilisation of AI and Learning Analytics in Education. Proceedings of ICAC3N 2021, IEEE. Greater Noida, India. 2021. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1109/ICAC3N53548.2021.9725439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC3N53548.2021.9725439
  4. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V. I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education — where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 16, Art. 39. P. 1–27. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  5. Page E. B. The Imminence of Grading Essays by Computer. Phi Delta Kappan. 1966. Vol. 47, №5. P. 238–243.
  6. Devlin J., Chang M. W., Lee K., Toutanova K. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019. Minneapolis: ACL. 2019. P. 4171–4186. DOI: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
  7. Dong F., Zhang Y. Automatic Features for Essay Scoring — An Empirical Study. Proceedings of EMNLP 2016. Austin, Texas: ACL. 2016. P. 1072–1077. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D16-1115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1115
  8. Taghipour K., Ng H. T. A Neural Approach to Automated Essay Scoring. Proceedings of EMNLP 2016. Austin, Texas: ACL. 2016. P. 1882–1891. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D16-1193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1193
  9. Yeshpanov R., Khassanov Y., Varol H. A. KazNERD: Kazakh Named Entity Recognition Dataset. Proceedings of LREC 2022. Marseille: ELRA. 2022. P. 417–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63317/5398gpuejb6t
  10. Luckin R., Holmes W., Griffiths M., Forcier L. B. Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson Education, 2016. 56 p.
  11. Baker R. S., Inventado P. S. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. New York: Springer (In: Learning Analytics / Ed. by J. A. Larusson, B. White), 2014. P. 61–75. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4
  12. Sommerville I. Software Engineering. 10th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2015. 816 p.
  13. Page E. B. Computer Grading of Student Essays: A Project in a Complex Cognitive Task. Journal of Experimental Education. 1994. Vol. 62, №2. P. 127–142.
  14. Riordan B., Horbach A., Cahill A., Zesch T., Lee C.-M. Investigating Neural Architectures for Short Answer Scoring. Proceedings of BEA@EMNLP 2017. Copenhagen: ACL. 2017. P. 159–168. DOI: 10.18653/v1/W17-5018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5017
  15. Dong F., Zhang Y., Yang J. Attention-Based Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Essay Scoring. Proceedings of CoNLL 2017. Vancouver: ACL. 2017. P. 153–162. DOI: 10.18653/v1/K17-1017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K17-1017
adaptive system, artificial intelligence, automated assessment, cloud technologies, independent work, machine learning, NLP, web platform

How to Cite

ISSUES OF DESIGNING AN AI-BASED WEB PLATFORMFOR AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT WORK ASSIGNMENTS. (2026). Scientific Journal "Bulletin of the K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University", 84(2), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.70239/arsu.2026.t84.n2.06