FUNDAMENTALS OF MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH DESIGN: ANALYSIS OF MASTER'S STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF METHODOLOGICAL TRAINING

Published 2026-06-30
PEDAGOGY Vol. 84 No. 2 (2026)
Том 84 №2 2026
Authors:
  • UPADHYAY B.
  • SADYKOVA S.A.
PDF

The article presents the experiences of organizing and conducting a scientific and practical workshop on " Basics of Mixed Methods Research Design," which took place on October 14-15 at K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University as part of post " Bolashaq " ("500 Scholars") program. The goal of the workshop was to improve the methodological competence of graduate students in the field of mixed methods research and building awareness as well as developing ethical research skills. To assess the effectiveness of the workshop and identify current student needs, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five graduate students from various educational programs. A thematic analysis of the interviews showed that graduates have a basic understanding of mixed methods as a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches but experience difficulties with practical applications (e.g. design, sampling, data integration, analysis, and research ethics). Participants showed a need for practice-oriented skills building, including examples of case studies, tool development training, and on-going mentoring supports. Finally, the analysis showed that there is a greater need for students to learn about mixed methods as a part of the mandatory graduate level methodological courses. In addition, students need greater encouragement to learn and pursue mixed methods research through interdisciplinary projects. Furthermore, a continuous focus on research ethics needs to be part of graduate students’ educational and research practices.

UPADHYAY B.

PhD, professor, Department of organizational leadership, policy and development in education, college of education and human development, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus), Minneapolis, USA.

Е-mail: bhaskar@umn.edu, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5141-3778 

SADYKOVA S.A.

PhD, associate professor of department of foreign philology and translation studies, K. Zhubanov Aktobe regional university, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

Е-mail: ssadykova@zhubanov.edu.kz, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-7680

  1. Creswell J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009. – 260 p.
  2. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2010. – 912 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
  3. Fetters M.D., Curry L.A., Creswell J.W. Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 2013. Volume 48. Issue 6 (Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
  4. Plano Clark V.L., Ivankova N.V. Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341
  5. Droog A., Weaver K.D., Brady F. Along for the Journey: Graduate Student Perceptions of Research. College & Research Libraries, 2024. Volume 85. Issue 6. 804–825.
  6. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.6.826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.6.826
  7. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2010. – 488 p.
  8. Braun V., Clarke V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006. Volume 3. Issue 2. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Earley M.A. A Synthesis of the Literature on Research Methods Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 2014. Volume 19. Issue 3. 242–253.
  10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
  11. Stern C., Lizarondo L., Carrier J., Godfrey C., Rieger K., Salmond S., Apóstolo J., Kirkpatrick P., Loveday H. Methodological Guidance for the Conduct of Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2020. Volume 18. Issue 10. 2108–2118.
  12. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169
  13. Iphofen R., Tolich M. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics. – London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2018. – 664 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435446
mixed methods research, research design, graduate students, Bolashak program, methodological training, thematic analysis, research ethics

How to Cite

FUNDAMENTALS OF MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH DESIGN: ANALYSIS OF MASTER’S STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF METHODOLOGICAL TRAINING. (2026). Scientific Journal "Bulletin of the K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University", 84(2), 184-193. https://doi.org/10.70239/arsu.2026.t84.n2.20